Skip to main content
· 1/15/1999

Harley-Davidson, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ronald Grottanelli, Doing Business as the Hog Farm, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 164 F.3d 806
  • 49 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1458
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that a trademark parody make some comment on the original work to qualify as parody
  • “We have accorded considerable leeway to parodists whose expressive works aim their parodie commentary at a trademark or trademarked product, but have not hesitated to prevent a manufacturer from using an alleged parody of a competitor’s mark to sell a competing product.”
  • using Harley-Davidson logo to advertise motorcycle repair shop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, McLaughlin, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.