Skip to main content
· 9/26/1888

Harle v. Morgan & Co.

Citations

  • 29 S.C. 258
  • 7 S.E. 487
  • 1888 S.C. LEXIS 136

Syllabus

<p>J. Affcor an appeal, and at the rehearing of the case on Circuit, defendants, under an oral demurrer that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, urged the objection that there was a variance between the original complaint and the copy served. Held, that all objection to this variance was waived.</p> <p>2. The caption of the complaint stated the names and partnership of the defendants, and the complaint alleged that “the defendants, the said firm of A. J. Morgan & Co., executed and delivered their written obligation,” &c. Held, on oral demurrer interposed at the trial, that there was a sufficient allegation of the partnership of defendants.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.