Harlaux v. Harlaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's conviction for manslaughter affirmed because we found that the jury could have reasonably found that the defendant believed that he was about to be assaulted and that he had \acted out of a sudden heat of passion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).