Harlan v. Vetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that for a deed to be effective, the instrument must be sufficient for the grantor and grantee to be ascertained and must be signed and acknowledged by the grantor and contain words of grant or operative words of grant showing the intention of grantor to convey title
• stating that for a deed to be effective, the instrument must be sufficient for the grantor and grantee to be ascertained and must be signed and acknowledged by the grantor and contain words of grant or operative words of grant showing the intention of grantor to convey title
• stating that for a deed to be effective, the instrument must be sufficient for the grantor and grantee to be ascertained and must be signed and acknowledged by the grantor and contain words of grant or operative words of grant showing the intention of grantor to convey title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cherokee Water Co. v. Freeman
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-12-05· cited 59×
• Reiland v. Patrick Thomas Properties, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-30· cited 38×
• Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2005-01-20· cited 34×
• Ostrowski v. Ivanhoe Property Owners Improvement Ass'n
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-02-21· cited 34×
• MASGAS v. Anderson
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-05-06· cited 21×
• Wright v. E.P. Operating Ltd. Partnership
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1998-11-25· cited 20×
• Mueller v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-02-04· cited 2×
• Smith v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-11· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-02-03
• Michael F. Reiland, Sr. v. Patrick Thomas Properties, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-09-28
• Daniel Montes, Jr. D/B/A Contract Builders v. Monticello Partners, L.P. D/B/A Monticello Crossroads
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-02-05
• Bernard Dolenz, Trustee v. Juan Banda
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-06-25
• August Meduna, Jr. v. Ruth Holder, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Minnie Meduna, N.C.M.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-18
• Marrs and Smith, Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil and Gas Company, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-07-03
• Gore Oil Company D/B/A Crego Exploration v. Steve Roosth, Trustee New Horizons Oil & Gas, Ltd. And John D. Proctor, Trustee
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2005-01-20
• MPH Production Company, Inc. v. Henry and Nadine McQueen
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-08-30
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-05-29
• in the Matter of the Estate of J.L. Beasley
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2014-05-22
• Masgas, a Partnership, and MHW, Inc. v. E.D. Anderson
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-03-31
• Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P. v. Saratoga Timber Co., Ltd., Batson Corridor, L.P., and Timbervest Partners Texas, L.P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-01-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alford v. Krum
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 73×
• Broaddus v. Grout
  Texas Supreme Court· 1953-05-13· cited 69×
• Texas Consolidated Oils v. Bartels
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1954-07-09· cited 34×
• Woodworth v. Cortez
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-08-31· cited 32×
• Brown v. Byrd
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-25· cited 28×
• Rosestone Properties, Inc. v. Schliemann
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-10-19· cited 23×
• Harris v. Strawbridge
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1960-01-14· cited 20×
• Coppard v. Glasscock
  Texas Commission of Appeals· 1932-02-24· cited 14×
• Haltom v. Austin National Bank
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-01· cited 6×