Skip to main content
· 3/19/1957

Harlan v. City of Tucson

Citations

  • 309 P.2d 244
  • 82 Ariz. 111
  • 1957 Ariz. LEXIS 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[O]ur legislature in enacting [laws governing state highways] felt the duty to the traveling public could best be served ... by placing exclusive control in one agency, the state highway department, rather than having a dual control within city limits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Windes, Phelps, Struckmeyer, Prade, Udall, Hon, McCarthy, County

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.