Fourth Circuit· 10/10/1935
Harlan v. Archer
Citations
- 79 F.2d 673
- 102 A.L.R. 149
- 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Settled rules of law precluded consequential damages for loss of business or its destruction being considered in determining the value of the land taken . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northcott, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Trustee for Carl Benjamin Schafer, Bankrupt v. Travelers Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1963-06-25· cited 26×
- Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bargain City, USA, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1966-02-14· cited 9×
- In re SmithN.D. Iowa· 1966-03-25· cited 1×
- Roberts v. Kimbrough. In Re PlowdenFourth Circuit· 1954-05-03
- Kohn v. BatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1949-06-24
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1917-03-19· cited 590×
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 246×
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 219×
- Wilber Nat. Bank of Oneonta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 139×
- Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1878-12-18· cited 136×
- Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court· 1879-05-18· cited 112×
- Wallace v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-04-20· cited 82×
- Williams v. HeardSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 71×
- Blagge v. BalchSupreme Court· 1896-04-13· cited 27×
- Green v. City & Suburban Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1894-01-11· cited 22×
- In re Banks' WillCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1898-04-01· cited 20×
- Brooks v. AhrensCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1888-01-05· cited 15×
- Suskin & Berry, Inc. v. RumleyFourth Circuit· 1930-01-14· cited 14×
- In re WetmoreThird Circuit· 1901-04-29· cited 13×
- Taft v. . MarsilyNew York Court of Appeals· 1890-06-03· cited 8×
- In re NaborsN.D. Alabama· 1922-05-16· cited 3×
- Kingsbury v. MattocksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1889-02-18· cited 2×
Other cases named Harlan v. Archer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.