Harkonen v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts that have reviewed the IQA have uniformly found that it ‘does not create any legal right to information or its correctness.’”
• “An agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is entitled to judicial deference unless that interpretation is ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.’” (quoting Auer, 519 U.S. at 461)
• dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).