Skip to main content
· 10/15/2009

Hariyanto v. Holder

Citations

  • 348 F. App'x 680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Determining the dispute in this case would require this Court to undertake a fact-intensive review of the value of the property and the amount of taxes in question. Courts have abstained from hearing section 505 requests when the tax issue is fact intensive.\
  • “Determining the dispute in this case would require this Court to undertake a fact-intensive review of the value of the property and the amount of taxes in question. Courts have abstained from hearing section 505 requests when the tax issue is fact intensive.”
  • \These issues do not affect the Court's need to administer the bankruptcy case in an orderly and efficient manner because ... determination of the debtor's tax liability is not a condition to confirmation of the Plan.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Jon, Livingston, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.