Harish v. Raj

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no confidential relationship exists where the parties grew up together and were close friends
• affirming trial court’s summary judgment to defendant on issue of confidential relationship
• affirming trial court’s summary judgment to defendant on issue of confidential relationship
• although parties may have owed each other a fiduciary duty in other respects, there was no basis for an inference that confidential relationship existed with respect to the transaction at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).