Skip to main content
· 2/16/1988

Harilaos Kukias v. Chandris Lines, Inc.

Citations

  • 839 F.2d 860
  • 1989 A.M.C. 1277
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1806
  • 1988 WL 10184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “this first factor is of little significance.”
  • recognizing the possibility that ship operator could be Jones Act employer and that ship owner could be Jones Act employer under borrowed servant principles but not explicitly stating that a seaman can have more than one employer at the same time under the Jones Act
  • “The post-Rhoditis decisions continue to consider the full range of factors relevant to a choice-of-law determination, and, in appropriate cases, have declined to apply the Jones Act despite a finding that the shipowner had substantial domestic contacts.”
  • allegiance of corporations determined by domiciliaries of parent corporations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: , Breyer, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.