Harianto v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that implying consent to a third-party release based on inaction “is simply not realistic or fair, and would stretch the meaning of ‘consent’ beyond the breaking point.”
• noting that “circumstances may justify a different approach in different cases.”
• collecting cases and finding that a vote in favor of the plan was consent to the release in the plan absent evidence of coercion
• “As to creditors who might vote to reject the Plan: the Court noted that it was difficult to understand why any other action should be required to show that the creditor also objected to the proposed third party releases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).