Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 3604(a) applies to “predatory practices” in lending because those practices “can make housing unavailable by putting borrowers at risk of losing the property which secures their loans”
• finding that such a requirement would allow an injustice to continue so long as it was visited exclusively on one class of people
• declining to dismiss the plaintiff’s RICO claims in part because the plaintiff had alleged multiple frauds against multiple borrowers clearly related in purpose and method
• a claim against the defendant mortgage lenders for violating the FHA must show that (1) the defendants’ lending practices and loan terms were unfair and predatory, and (2) the defendants either intentionally targeted on the basis of race or there was a disparate impact on the basis of race
• a claim against the defendant mortgage lenders for violating the FHA must show that (1) the defendants’ lending practices and loan terms were unfair and predatory, and (2) the defendants either intentionally targeted on the basis of race or there was a disparate impact on the basis of race

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).