· 2/1/1962
Hargleroad v. United States
Citations
- 202 F. Supp. 92
- 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 660
- 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5099
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff failed to comply with her Rule 26(e) obligations by “foot-dragging” in supplementing her incomplete interrogatory responses
- finding supplemental responses untimely 4 when made months after learning of information
- party who failed to sign her interrogatory answers in violation of Rule 33 was subject to sanctions
- sanctioning party who failed to sign interrogatory responses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.