Skip to main content
· 2/1/1962

Hargleroad v. United States

Citations

  • 202 F. Supp. 92
  • 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 660
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff failed to comply with her Rule 26(e) obligations by “foot-dragging” in supplementing her incomplete interrogatory responses
  • finding supplemental responses untimely 4 when made months after learning of information
  • party who failed to sign her interrogatory answers in violation of Rule 33 was subject to sanctions
  • sanctioning party who failed to sign interrogatory responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.