Hargens v. United States Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the plaintiffs statements to the EEOC presented a sufficient predicate upon which one reasonably would expect the agency to investigate a claim even if not raised in the complaint and actually investigated, the claim is not barred from judicial consideration”
• federal employees not covered by ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).