Skip to main content
· 1/14/1997

Harford Mutual Insurance v. Woodfin Equities Corp.

Citations

  • 687 A.2d 652
  • 344 Md. 399
  • 1997 Md. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no coverage either for the costs of installing a new wetland retaining wall or for wetland repaid costs necessitated by the installation of the new wall
  • “[W]hen a declaratory judgment action is brought, and the controversy is appropriate for resolution by declaratory judgment, the trial court must render a declaratory judgment”
  • “This Court has reiterated time after time that, when a declaratory judgment action is brought, and the controversy is appropriate for resolution by declaratory judgment, ‘the trial court must render a declaratory judgment.’”
  • “[W]here a party requests a declaratory judgment, it is error for a trial court to dispose of a case simply with oral rulings and a grant of ... judgment in favor of the prevailing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Submitted to Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.