Harel v. Rutgers, State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Faculty Appeal Board's recommendation for tenure and disagreement with the President, Vice President, and University's denial of tenure was insufficient to warrant grant of tenure
• “To establish a continuing violation, a plaintiff must show that: (1) at least one allegedly discriminatory act occurred within the filing period and (2
• two acts in nine years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).