Skip to main content
· 1/8/1912

Hare v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

Citations

  • 101 Ark. 564
  • 142 S.W. 862
  • 1912 Ark. LEXIS 348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mandamus to be appropriate remedy for a party who claims title to an office, and asks for the removal of the occupant and rejecting the argument that quo warranto was another legal remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.