Skip to main content
· 8/4/1999

Hare v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone

Citations

  • 743 So. 2d 551
  • 1999 WL 565810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Intended third-party beneficiaries of testamentary documents are found to have standing in legal malpractice cases if they are able to show ‘that the testator’s intent as expressed in the will is frustrated by the negligence of the testator’s attorney.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.