Skip to main content
· 7/7/1952

Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.

Citations

  • 249 S.W.2d 973
  • 220 Ark. 601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting a caveat, or deviation from the general rule, “so as not to entrench on property rights acquired by reason of our previous decisions”
  • “Buying at a credit price, as distinguished from a cash price ... is being used as a cloak for usury in many cases by such words as ‘time price differential,’ or some other such language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFaddiN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.