Skip to main content
· 6/9/1928

Hare & Chase, Inc. v. Dunton

Citations

  • 8 S.W.2d 315
  • 1928 Tex. App. LEXIS 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here an opinion establishes precedent on a rarely-litigated constitutional issue . . . , that presents a reason to deny vacatur.”
  • “A decision’s preclusive effect (whether claim preclusion or issue preclusion) bars future litigation of that same cause of action or of the same issue of law or fact litigated between the same parties. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Looney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.