Hardy v. Stevenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing as moot similar claim where defendants had shown that “recovery of the [requested] emails is technologically impossible”
• “The Government then requested additional time to respond . . . to enable more extensive efforts to obtain the emails.”
• “[T]he difference between [the 26 ‘fatal loss’] standard—set forth in the mootness context—and the appropriate standard in the 27 standing context is almost inconsequential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).