· 10/15/1831
Hardy v. Rowe
Citations
- 7 Wend. 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that bank had no duty of care to borrower even when it “told [her] not to make her [monthly] loan payment in order to be considered for a loan modification”
- finding, at summary judgment, a genuine issue of triable fact as to whether 10 inducing lender to default on her home and selling it was extreme and outrageous
- determining there was a question of fact as to outrageous 12 conduct where allegations included that the defendant advised that they could not accept loan 13 payments nor foreclose until the conclusion of a forgery investigation, but then foreclosed the 14 property anyway
- “No fiduciary duty exists 5 between a borrower and lender in an arm's length transaction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.