Hardy v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff “could have hiked to the mountain’s summit for free”
• affirming a dismissal with prejudice where the petitioner failed 21 to file within the AEDPA’s statute of limitations
• affirming “the fundamental principle [that] a party to a contract 21 is necessary, and if not susceptible to joinder, indispensable to litigation seeking to 22 decimate that contract”
• “Whatever mode of transportation [the plaintiff] used to arrive at the summit is immaterial: the attractions there were free to all.”
• “Whatever mode of transportation [the plaintiff] used to arrive at the summit is immaterial: the attractions there were free to all.”
• courts apply choice-of-law principles of forum state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).