Skip to main content
· 12/15/1993

Hardy v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.

Citations

  • 842 F. Supp. 713
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 878
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17505
  • 1993 WL 553979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although Mr. Senyshyn died intestate, it is undisputed that Ms. Senyshyn is the sole—or at least primary—distributee of her husband’s estate.”
  • “To require the plaintiffs to petition the Surrogate’s Court to appoint a representative, and thereafter renew their motion to substitute, is precisely the type of rigidity that contravenes the purposes of amended Rule 25(a)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.