Hardy v. Government of the District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Rule 23(a) satisfied where plaintiffs challenged the seizure of their property without adequate notice, despite individual differences in the circumstances of each seizure
• “[T]he damages are fixed in that the District’s own records . . . reflect the monetary amount that each plaintiff lost. Even assuming interest were to apply to those sums, the calculation of damages claims in this case would clearly be a mechanical task.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).