Hardy v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• KRS 532.110(1)(b) precludes ordering two or more definite sentences to run consecutively
• KRS 532.110(1)(b) precludes ordering two or more definite sentences to run consecutively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Lawson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 25×