Hardy Brownell v. Robert Krom, Scott Mentnech, Ross Loucks, Richard Bivens, Roger Specht, and C. Ferrafola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a grievance for recovery of lost property was insufficient to exhaust a claim for intentional mishandling of property in retaliation for protected conduct
• holding that a grievance for recovery of lost property was insufficient to exhaust a claim for intentional mishandling of property in retaliation for protected conduct
• observing that “grievance may not be so vague as to preclude prison officials from taking appropriate measures to resolve the complaint internally”
• holding that while it is “appropriate to afford pro se inmates a liberal grievance pleading standard, the grievance may not be so vague as to preclude prison officials from taking appropriate measures to resolve the complaint internally”
• noting that a grievance “may not be so vague as to preclude prison officials from taking appropriate measures to resolve the complaint internally”
• explaining that a prisoner’s “grievance may not be so vague as to preclude prison officials from taking appropriate measures to resolve the complaint internally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).