Skip to main content
· 10/20/1950

Hardwick v. Poole

Citations

  • 313 Ky. 706
  • 233 S.W.2d 419
  • 1950 Ky. LEXIS 967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is a “fact specific inquiry dependent on the particular warning at issue in each case”
  • it is a \fact specific inquiry dependent on the particular warning at issue in each case\
  • “[M]anufacturer submission of a proposed labeling change is relevant, but not dispositive, in determining whether a defendant can establish conflict preemption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Rees

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.