· 2/27/1976
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.
Citations
- 240 N.W.2d 814
- 307 Minn. 290
- 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1434
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “where contacts are substantial with respect to both quantity and quality, it is not essential to find that they are also related to the cause of action”
- when a defendant challenges jurisdiction, the plaintiff has the burden of proving a prima facie case supporting jurisdiction
- exercise of general jurisdiction proper where nonresident defendant held negotiations, inspections, and planning sessions in Minnesota
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Kelly, MacLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.