Skip to main content
· 2/27/1976

Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.

Citations

  • 240 N.W.2d 814
  • 307 Minn. 290
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “where contacts are substantial with respect to both quantity and quality, it is not essential to find that they are also related to the cause of action”
  • when a defendant challenges jurisdiction, the plaintiff has the burden of proving a prima facie case supporting jurisdiction
  • exercise of general jurisdiction proper where nonresident defendant held negotiations, inspections, and planning sessions in Minnesota

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Kelly, MacLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.