Hardman v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an ALJ must “discuss the significantly probative evidence supporting claimant’s allegations on which he chose not to rely”
• holding that ALJ’s boilerplate adverse credibility finding failed to explain the claimant’s regular reports of pain and numerous prescription pain medications, which supported claimant’s allegations of severe pain
• noting that the ALJ may not “pick and choose among medical reports, using portions of evidence favorable to his position while ignoring other evidence.”
• noting that the ALJ may not “pick and choose among medical reports, using portions of evidence favorable to his position while ignoring other evidence.”
• noting that the ALJ may not “pick and choose among medical reports, using portions of evidence favorable to his position while ignoring other evidence.”
• noting that the ALJ may not “pick and choose among medical reports, using portions of evidence favorable to his position while ignoring other evidence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).