Skip to main content
· 4/5/1930

Hardman Lumber Co. v. Spitznaugle

Citations

  • 130 Kan. 346
  • 286 P. 235
  • 1930 Kan. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The intention which controls is that manifested by the objective, visible facts.”
  • “It is sufficient if the item is intended to remain where affixed until worn out, until the purpose to which the realty is devoted is accomplished or until the item is superseded by another item more suitable for the purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson, Jochems

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.