Skip to main content
· 9/29/1998

Harding v. Rosewell

Citations

  • 22 F. Supp. 2d 806
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15903
  • 1998 WL 748298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The timing of [the plaintiff]’s termination after the delivery of the letter and the conflicting testimony create a fact question for the jury on the causal connection between the letter and termination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.