Harding v. Inhabitants of Medway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence leading to inferences that the defendant committed a certain crime, on its own, can- not overcome the prejudicial effect of improper misconduct evidence
• identifying “the importance of the erroneously admitted evidence to a party’s theory of the case” as being relevant to the harmlessness analysis
• “If there is little likelihood that the error affected the verdict, we will not reverse on the basis of that error.”
• “[D]efendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”
• “Defendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”
• “[D]efendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).