Skip to main content

Hardin v. Hardin

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 532
  • 801 S.E.2d 774
  • 2017 WL 2623867
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
  • noting that application of the right-for-any- reason rule is discretionary
  • noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
  • noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
  • “Appellate courts, however, retain discretion to apply the ‘right for any reason’ rule on de novo review and consider alternative legal theories or analysis not relied on by the trial court on summary judgment.”
  • “Appellate courts . . . retain discretion to apply the ‘right for any reason’ rule on de novo review and consider alternative legal theories or analysis not relied on by the trial court on summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines, Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.