Hardin v. Flashpoller's Sons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conflict among the appellate courts regarding the meaning of statutory phrase suggests that the language is ambiguous
• “When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there is no need for [the court] to apply the rules of statutory interpretation”
• “ ‘When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there is no need for this court to apply the rules of statutory interpretation’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).