Hardin v. Farris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations “until the right of action is discovered, or, by the exercise of ordinary diligence, could have been discovered”
• “Normally some positive act of concealment must be shown.... However, in a confidential relationship where there exists a duty to speak, such as in a doctor-patient relationship, mere silence constitutes fraudulent concealment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).