Skip to main content
· 10/10/2013

Hardin v. Bishop

Citations

  • 2013 Ark. 395
  • 430 S.W.3d 49
  • 2013 WL 5574019
  • 2013 Ark. LEXIS 466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that merely raising the arguments in the motion for summary judgment is sufficient to preserve the issues on appeal
  • “In [Alpha Marketing], sovereign immunity was the basis of our jurisdiction, and as such, that finding was necessary for our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Courtney Hudson Goodson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.