Skip to main content

Hardie v. State

Citations

  • 513 So. 2d 791
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police officers who had prior knowledge and contact with defendant could properly testify and identify him
  • holding that police officers who had prior knowledge and contact with defendant could properly testify and identify him
  • holding that police officers who had prior knowledge and contact with the defendant before the crime at issue could testify as to the defendant’s identity so long as they did not identify themselves as police
  • holding that police officers who had prior knowledge and contact with the defendant before the crime at issue could testify as to the defendant’s identity so long as they did not identify themselves as police
  • holding that police officers who had prior knowledge and contact with the defendant before the crime at issue could testify as to the defendant’s identity so long as they did not identify themselves as police
  • holding that it was error to allow five police officers who identified defendant in video surveillance to testify that they were acquainted with the defendant in a smash-and-grab robbery case based on the defendant having been involved in prior \investigations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.