· 9/4/1992
Harder v. Wagler
Citations
- 838 P.2d 366
- 17 Kan. App. 2d 403
- 1992 Kan. App. LEXIS 552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the rule despite a party’s contention that two documents were unambiguous if interpreted separately
- applying the rule despite a party’s contention that two documents were unambiguous if interpreted separately
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brazil, Elliott, Pierron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.