Harder v. Matthews
Citations
- 67 Wash. 487
- 121 P. 983
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1202
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Coepoeations — Use of Streets — Collision With Automobile — Contributory Neglioence — Evidence—Sufficiency. A pedestrian hurrying diagonally across a busy street to catch a street car on the opposite side of the street, is guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law, preventing recovery for damages from being struck by an automobile going in the opposite direction, where it appears that she left the curb 150 feet from the crossing, near a standing express wagon which obstructed her view of approaching vehicles, that she walked from behind the express wagon and stepped in front of the approaching automobile without seeing it, and the driver did not see her until she was struck, notwithstanding that the automobile was being driven at the rate of 25 miles an hour.</p>
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Crowl v. West Coast Steel Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1920-01-13· cited 28×
- Franey v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-07-13· cited 20×
- Ludwigs v. DumasWashington Supreme Court· 1913-02-08· cited 15×
- Clark v. JonesOregon Supreme Court· 1919-03-18· cited 9×
- Rhimer v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 1922-09-17· cited 7×
- Tooker v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1915-08-11· cited 7×
- Deets v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1924-01-24· cited 5×
- Todd v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-11· cited 3×
- Miller v. Spokane Bakery Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1912-08-26· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.