Harden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Alford plea created a rebuttable presumption that an insurance company had no duty to provide coverage or defend in a subsequent civil suit
• concluding that Alford plea created a rebuttable presumption that an insurance company had no duty to provide coverage or defend in a subsequent civil suit
• holding that evidence that an insured entered an Alford plea of guilty was sufficient to establish a prima facie case that an insurer had no duty under the policy to provide coverage or a defense
• finding that homeowner’s insurance company had no duty to indemnify insured who sexually molested a minor child, as the insured “engaged in intentional (not accidental
• insurer had no duty to provide coverage or a defense to insured where complaint alleged that insured’s husband engaged in intentional sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).