Skip to main content
· 9/25/2006

Harden v. Harden (In Re Harden)

Citations

  • 351 B.R. 643
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2379
  • 2006 WL 2728824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • computing monthly income accurately would be reflected in utilization of 4.3 weekly periods per month (i.e. 2.1667 bi-weekly pay periods)
  • computing monthly income accurately would be reflected in utilization of 4.3 weekly periods per month (i.e. 2.1667 bi-weekly pay periods)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary P. Gorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.