Skip to main content
· 8/31/1998

Harden v. Danek Medical, Inc.

Citations

  • 985 S.W.2d 449
  • 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 603
  • 1998 WL 547052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to file third amended complaint in manufacturing defect case
  • “In order to recover under the theory of negligence per se . . . the defendant must have violated a statute or ordinance that imposes a duty or prohibition... .” (emphasis added)
  • finding no liability where plaintiff failed to establish causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Franks, Goddard, McMurray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.