· 8/31/1998
Harden v. Danek Medical, Inc.
Citations
- 985 S.W.2d 449
- 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 603
- 1998 WL 547052
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to file third amended complaint in manufacturing defect case
- “In order to recover under the theory of negligence per se . . . the defendant must have violated a statute or ordinance that imposes a duty or prohibition... .” (emphasis added)
- finding no liability where plaintiff failed to establish causation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Franks, Goddard, McMurray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.