Skip to main content
· 3/18/2004

Hardeep Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Citations

  • 361 F.3d 1152
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5127
  • 2004 WL 527859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues not raised in a petitioner’s opening brief are waived
  • explaining that the respondent “suffers no prejudice from [a petitioner’s] failure to properly raise [an] issue” when the respondent briefed it in its answer
  • summary dismissal appropriate where notice of appeal lacked sufficient specificity and no separate written brief was filed
  • summary dismissal appropriate where notice of appeal lacked sufficient specificity and no separate written brief was filed
  • summary dismissal appropriate where notice of appeal lacked sufficient specificity and no separate written brief was filed
  • summary dismissal appropriate where notice of appeal lacked sufficient specificity and no separate written brief was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Tallman, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.