Skip to main content
· 10/5/1992

Harcourt v. General Accident Insurance

Citations

  • 615 A.2d 71
  • 419 Pa. Super. 155
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a PRO, because of its financial relationship with an insurer, is not an independent body
  • noting that a PRO, because of its financial relationship with an insurer, is not an independent body
  • construing peer review provisions of MVFRL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Kelly, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.