· 10/21/2009
Harcar v. Harcar
Citations
- 982 A.2d 1230
- 2009 Pa. Super. 203
- 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4982
- 2009 WL 3367056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in finding mother in contempt for violating two custody orders but failing to impose sanctions
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion for failing to impose sanctions on a parent who flagrantly disregarded a custody order
- stating that attorney fees may be awarded as a sanction to compensate the contemnor’s adversary for injuries resulting from noncompliance with a court order
- explaining that the elements of civil contempt including a hearing and an adjudication
- stating, “[I]t is within the trial court’s purview as the finder of fact to determine which factors are most salient and critical in each particular case.”
- “The contempt power is essential to -7- J-A17010-22 the preservation of the court’s authority and prevents the administration of justice from falling into disrepute.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Donohue, Shogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.