Skip to main content
· 10/21/2009

Harcar v. Harcar

Citations

  • 982 A.2d 1230
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 203
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4982
  • 2009 WL 3367056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in finding mother in contempt for violating two custody orders but failing to impose sanctions
  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion for failing to impose sanctions on a parent who flagrantly disregarded a custody order
  • stating that attorney fees may be awarded as a sanction to compensate the contemnor’s adversary for injuries resulting from noncompliance with a court order
  • explaining that the elements of civil contempt including a hearing and an adjudication
  • stating, “[I]t is within the trial court’s purview as the finder of fact to determine which factors are most salient and critical in each particular case.”
  • “The contempt power is essential to -7- J-A17010-22 the preservation of the court’s authority and prevents the administration of justice from falling into disrepute.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Donohue, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.