Skip to main content
· 3/18/1992

Harborside Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. Howard Vogel Edward Benenson

Citations

  • 959 F.2d 368
  • 1992 WL 35429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the application of claim preclusion to actions for declaratory relief would “subvert the very interests in judicial economy that the doctrine was designed to serve”
  • “[Bjoth federal and New York State law recognize the declaratory judgment exception articulated in the Restatement.”
  • “Many jurisdictions recognize an exception to ordinary res judicata principles where, as here, the prior action involved only a request for declaratory relief.”
  • preclusive effect of the declaratory judgment is limited to the subject matter of the relief sought
  • “Under this exception, the preclusive effect of the declaratory judgment is limited to the subject matter of the declaratory relief sought.”
  • “[B]oth federal and New York State law recognize the declaratory judgment exception articulated in the Restatement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Walker, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.