Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Boundary Waters Broadcasters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the Minnesota Supreme Court in United Wild Rice “only recognized the tort of intentional interference with prospective contractual relations,” but leaving “for another day” the issue of “[w]hether this is a distinction without a difference”
• tortious interference with business relations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).