Harbison v. Hammons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that instruction was sufficient where court instructed jury regarding whether degree of force used by officer was reasonable
• holding that “hurling saliva” does not “by [its] nature, necessarily obstruct, resist, hinder or endanger an officer,” unlike “conduct that includes hurling a bottle or other Object, capable of causing harm, at an officer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).