Harbin v. Harbin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Without a finding of unfitness the child’s selection must be recognized and the court has no discretion to act otherwise.”
• “Without a finding of unfitness the child’s selection must be recognized and the court has no discretion to act otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-03-27· cited 66×
• Westmoreland v. Westmoreland
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-02-06· cited 13×
• Driver v. Sene
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-06· cited 13×
• Walker v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-21· cited 11×
• Ford v. Hanna
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-18· cited 5×
• Parkerson v. Parkerson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-07-01· cited 2×
• Edler v. Hedden.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-21· cited 1×
• Terry L. Belknap v. Michelle M. Belknap
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-09-23
• Charles R. Driver v. Holly E. Sene
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barnes v. Tant
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1961-07-06· cited 16×
• Adams v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1964-02-06· cited 15×
• Pritchett v. Pritchett
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1964-02-06· cited 12×
• Froug v. Harper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1965-02-04· cited 9×
• Forrester v. Livingston
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1961-05-09· cited 3×
• Harbin v. Harbin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-04-08· cited 2×